Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00625
Original file (BC 2014 00625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00625

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code “2X” (First Term, Second Term, or Career 
Airman non-selected for reenlistment) be changed to allow 
reentry into the National Guard.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received an Honorable discharge and would like to get back 
into the Guard and continue to serve his country.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 8 Jul 
08.

On 10 Sep 10, the applicant received an Article 15, Nonjudicial 
Punishment, for violating Article 92, consuming alcohol while 
under the legal age of 21.  The applicant was reduced in grade 
to airman (suspended), forfeited $100 per pay for one month and 
given 15 days of extra duty.

On 24 Feb 11, the applicant’s commander non-selected him for 
reenlistment based on multiple disciplinary infractions and off 
duty behavior. 

On 21 May 11, the applicant was furnished an honorable 
discharge, and was credited with 2 years, 10 months, and 23 days 
of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit B.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant was discharged under 
the Fiscal Year 2011 Air Force – Force Shaping Rollback Program.  
The applicant’s commander non-selected him for reenlistment 
under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP); which, resulted 
in the “2X” RE Code.  In accordance with AFI 36-2606, 
Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment 
selection or non-selection authority.  They may consider the 
member’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable 
Information from any substantiated source, the airman’s 
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the 
airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty 
performance levels.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been a victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00625 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 8 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 14.

						










Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842

    Original file (BC 2014 03842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281

    Original file (BC 2014 01281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “LGH” (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01804

    Original file (BC 2014 01804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01804 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) be changed so he may reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03107

    Original file (BC 2014 03107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant’s record also contains a Memo for Record (MFR), dated 26 Feb 07, stating that he had previously been reenlistment eligible but due to new derogatory information he was now being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594

    Original file (BC 2014 00594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451

    Original file (BC 2013 03451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05961

    Original file (BC 2012 05961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of “2X” (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05961

    Original file (BC 2012 05961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of “2X” (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111

    Original file (BC 2014 02111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning “1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment,” be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03718

    Original file (BC 2014 03718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03718 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st Term, 2nd Term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed so he can reenter the military. On 14 Nov 11, the applicant’s commander did not select him for reenlistment under the Fiscal Year 2012 Date of Separation Rollback Program. The remaining...